From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Emde Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.8-rt11 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:01:47 +0100 Message-ID: <52E6D74B.80401@osadl.org> References: <20140125134519.GA9845@linutronix.de> <52E57D42.60206@pavlinux.ru> <52E61C52.6070104@linutronix.de> <52E62A05.7080802@pavlinux.ru> <20140127132411.6f420c8f@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-rt-users , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , John Kacur To: pavel@pavlinux.ru Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140127132411.6f420c8f@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On 01/27/2014 07:24 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:42:29 +0400 > Pavel Vasilyev wrote: > >> 27.01.2014 12:44, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5= =D1=82: >>> On 01/26/2014 10:25 PM, Pavel Vasilyev wrote: >>>> 25.01.2014 17:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5= =D1=82: >>>>> Dear RT folks! >>>> >>>> >>>> Gentlemen, let's have a month of stress testing! Divide tasks >>>> testing subsystem: USB, NET, MM, ACPI, AUDIO, VIDEO By CPUs: >>>> ARM/PPC/X86/X86_64... >>>> >>>> Purely on observations noted that in September 2013, the quality >>>> and stability of the code has deteriorated dramatically. >>> >>> By September 2k13, do you mean a specific v3.10-RT release? >>> >> >> Any after 3.2.x-rt >> >> Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but: >> >> 1) All kernels (3.2, 3.8, 3.12, 3.13,...) are working normally witho= ut patches; >> >> 2) 3.2 works fine in CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE or CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FUL= L modes; >> >> 3) 3.10 not works at all, even without -RT patches; > > Please report the problems here to LKML (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org= ) > to the appropriate maintainers. As well as the stable@vger.kernel.org > mailing list. > >> >> 4) 3.12 work only as CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE or CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FUL= L in >> uniprocessor mode (maxcpus=3D0, nosmp). Newer patches (Oct.-Dec.) d= id not work, >> even in RT_BASE mode. > > Does 3.12 work without the -rt patches? > >> >> Varia hardware: One Opteron 285, 2-cpus (4 cores). Six Intel Atoms d= evices >> kernels compiled as x86_32. > > I have an intel atom dev board hanging around somewhere. I'll see if = I > can test this. Can you send me your config privately. I can offer help as well. And I am most curious to learn what prevents=20 your systems from booting. Please send me your config as well - I'll ru= n=20 (or at least try to run) it on a couple of spare farm systems. -Carsten.