linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Couple of questions about details of the RT patch
@ 2014-02-06 18:17 Corey Minyard
  2014-02-13 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2014-02-06 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-rt-users

I was looking over the RT patch and I had a couple of questions:

Is there a reason that the PREEMPT_LAZY code is not ifdef-ed out when
PREEMPT_LAZY is disabled.  I can't see a reason to leave it in, it's
just dead code at that point.  I'd be happy to do a patch to fix this.

Why does preempt_disable_rt() become a barrier when PREEMPT_RT is
disabled?  Why isn't it just nothing?

Thanks,

-corey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Couple of questions about details of the RT patch
  2014-02-06 18:17 Couple of questions about details of the RT patch Corey Minyard
@ 2014-02-13 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
  2014-02-13 22:24   ` PATCHES for 3.14 Pavel Vasilyev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-02-13 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Corey Minyard; +Cc: linux-rt-users

On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Corey Minyard wrote:

> I was looking over the RT patch and I had a couple of questions:
> 
> Is there a reason that the PREEMPT_LAZY code is not ifdef-ed out when
> PREEMPT_LAZY is disabled.  I can't see a reason to leave it in, it's
> just dead code at that point.  I'd be happy to do a patch to fix this.
> 
> Why does preempt_disable_rt() become a barrier when PREEMPT_RT is
> disabled?  Why isn't it just nothing?

Because I'm a lazy bastard and I fundamentaly hate #ifdefs :)

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* PATCHES for 3.14
  2014-02-13 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-02-13 22:24   ` Pavel Vasilyev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Vasilyev @ 2014-02-13 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: linux-rt-users

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 147 bytes --]


Guys and Mainteiners, throw 3.12 and other non LTS version, please enjoy a 3.14
kernel. How will release, we will be "stable" patches :D




[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-13 22:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-06 18:17 Couple of questions about details of the RT patch Corey Minyard
2014-02-13 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-13 22:24   ` PATCHES for 3.14 Pavel Vasilyev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).