From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: WAS: linux-rt fails to boot on > 3.12.5.-rt7 ... NOW IS: linux-rt-3.14 boots by reverting patches + nvidia uses __rt_mutex_init [which in 3.14 has been changed to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL] Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:39:40 -0400 Message-ID: <535A9DDC.4070801@windriver.com> References: <535A7474.2090701@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: jordan Return-path: Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:64570 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751539AbaDYRjV (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:39:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 14-04-25 01:23 PM, jordan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Paul Gortmaker > wrote: >> On 14-04-19 10:42 AM, jordan wrote: >>> Hey Paul, >>> >>>> I've got some AMD kit that has just been freed up from winter >>>> heating duty - sometime later this week I should be able to try to >>>> reproduce what you have seen, and knowing it works w/o the above >>>> softirq patch monkeying around should be a good lead on this. >>> >>> That would be awesome! IIRC, Sebastian said that he didn't have said >>> h/w CPU kicking around to test with, at some point in my original >>> thread on this subject... and i just don't have the skill set required >> >> So I stuck the -rt patches onto 3.14.1 last night; made a defconfig >> and then enabled RT_FULL in the resulting .config and that booted >> right up on a 1090T six core phenom, which kind of surprised me. > > that surprises me too - maybe 3.14.1 fixed something? ...anyway, I am > only home for a short while [lunch] but i will try building 3.14.1-rt > when i get home and see what happens / report back. I had to drop one ipv6 patch that was now in stable, but otherwise it was straight forward to make a 3.14.1-rt P. -- > >> I should be able to dig up an athlon quad and see what it does... > > worth a look, i suppose. > > thanks Paul for the update > > Jordan Johnston >