From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Armin Steinhoff Subject: Re: Operation not permitted / pthread_setschedparam Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:50:26 +0200 Message-ID: <542FED12.6040603@steinhoff.de> References: <542A88A8.7060800@steinhoff.de> <542BACF1.3090405@steinhoff.de> <542D0689.8050602@steinhoff.de> <542FD0BE.10508@osadl.org> <542FE9B4.3060708@steinhoff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: rt-users To: Carsten Emde , Patrik Lundquist Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:57934 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750959AbaJDMu2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2014 08:50:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <542FE9B4.3060708@steinhoff.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, some RT threads of the openPOWERLINK threads (2.0.1) are running CPU affine on selected cores. Is this important ? --Armin Armin Steinhoff schrieb: > Carsten Emde schrieb: > [ clip] > Doesn't come another suspicion to mind? > Why should I have one? The same code works correctly under then non-RT > version of the kernel ... at least from the Linux point of view. > > --Armin >