From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Armin Steinhoff Subject: Re: Operation not permitted / pthread_setschedparam Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:57:50 +0200 Message-ID: <54339CFE.2050205@steinhoff.de> References: <542A88A8.7060800@steinhoff.de> <542BACF1.3090405@steinhoff.de> <542D0689.8050602@steinhoff.de> <542FD0BE.10508@osadl.org> <542FE9B4.3060708@steinhoff.de> <54312C88.8060609@steinhoff.de> <54329A4B.7080706@steinhoff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rt-users To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:52566 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751214AbaJGH6A (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:58:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Armin Steinhoff wrote: > >> Sorry ... I got now time to read your test code and results in detail. >> Your test shows only the absence of failures in your "test" scenario. > Correct. So that proves that the kernel behaviour is correct, right? There is a complete bug report now in the alternet tree -> rt: 85681 --Armin