From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 3.18] irq_work: Provide a soft-irq based queue
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:28:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552FE320.6050601@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552FD55F.8000105@siemens.com>
Instead of turning all irq_work requests into lazy ones on -rt, just
move their execution from hard into soft-irq context.
This resolves deadlocks of ftrace which will queue work from arbitrary
contexts, including those that have locks held that are needed for
raising a soft-irq.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
Second try, looks much better so far. And it also removes my concerns
regarding other potential cases besides ftrace.
kernel/irq_work.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index 9dda38a..3f6ffcd 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -85,12 +85,9 @@ bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
raise_irqwork = llist_add(&work->llnode,
&per_cpu(hirq_work_list, cpu));
else
- raise_irqwork = llist_add(&work->llnode,
- &per_cpu(lazy_list, cpu));
-#else
+#endif
raise_irqwork = llist_add(&work->llnode,
&per_cpu(raised_list, cpu));
-#endif
if (raise_irqwork)
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
@@ -114,21 +111,20 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ) {
if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list)))
arch_irq_work_raise();
- } else {
+ } else
+#endif
+ if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) {
if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list)) &&
tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
- }
#else
- if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) {
- if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list)) &&
- tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
arch_irq_work_raise();
+#endif
} else {
if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list)))
arch_irq_work_raise();
}
-#endif
preempt_enable();
@@ -202,6 +198,8 @@ void irq_work_run(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
irq_work_run_list(this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list));
+ if (!llist_empty(this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list)))
+ raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
#else
irq_work_run_list(this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list));
irq_work_run_list(this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list));
@@ -211,15 +209,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_run);
void irq_work_tick(void)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
- irq_work_run_list(this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list));
-#else
- struct llist_head *raised = &__get_cpu_var(raised_list);
+ struct llist_head *raised = this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list);
if (!llist_empty(raised) && !arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
irq_work_run_list(raised);
- irq_work_run_list(&__get_cpu_var(lazy_list));
-#endif
+ irq_work_run_list(this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list));
}
/*
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 14:06 [PATCH RT 3.18] ring-buffer: Mark irq_work as HARD_IRQ to prevent deadlocks Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 14:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-16 14:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 14:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 14:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 15:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 15:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-16 15:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 15:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 16:28 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2015-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH RT 3.18] irq_work: Provide a soft-irq based queue Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23 6:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23 6:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23 7:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23 6:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23 7:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23 7:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23 7:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-24 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-24 9:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-24 9:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-25 7:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-25 7:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-05-18 19:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552FE320.6050601@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).