From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch v4.4-rt2] sched: fix up preempt lazy forward port
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A2395D.3090106@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A22FE7.6070005@ti.com>
On 01/22/2016 02:34 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Do you still see it with the missing lazy bits? I don't see where this
>> could come from.
>>
>
> yep. I've tried it with and without changing _TIF_WORK_MASK
> Seems It's triggered by Virtual terminal keyboard_tasklet
Just bootet my current v4.4 to cross check what you see and I have this:
[ 3.808273] clocksource: Switched to clocksource arch_sys_counter
[ 3.851193] keyboard: kbd_init(1609)
[ 3.861903] keyboard: kbd_bh(1201)
[ 3.868322] keyboard: kbd_init(1612)
[ 3.868581] NET: Registered protocol family 2
So. No backtrace here. According to the full dmesg I should have all
CPUs up by now. kbd_bh is comming from ksoftirqd as well. No idea why
you see this.
There is a irq off region which sets and removes RUN bit, I have no
idea why you have this backtrace.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 9:08 [rfc patch v4.4-rt2] sched: fix up preempt lazy forward port Mike Galbraith
2016-01-18 20:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-19 2:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-21 12:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 12:24 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 13:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 13:34 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 14:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2016-01-22 15:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 18:21 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-21 15:11 ` [patch] sched,rt: __always_inline preemptible_lazy() Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 4:41 ` [rfc patch v4.4-rt2] sched: fix up preempt lazy forward port Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 5:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-22 11:58 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 12:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 20:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-25 17:14 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-01 13:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A2395D.3090106@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).