linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Al Dorrington <albert.dorrington@lmco.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fedora 10 as basis for RT?
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:45:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0904090745k675acde6v51df7dae4ac433d9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090409T134400-381@post.gmane.org>

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Al Dorrington
<albert.dorrington@lmco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a proof of concept project where we are going to try moving an
> application that runs on VxWorks to Linux. I believe with what I've read on this
> mailing list, and the RTwiki site that Linux is definitely up to the task with
> these kernel patches.
>
> However, I am not really sure which distribution of Linux we should use as the
> base, nor am I sure if it would be better to stick with the 'i386' distribution
> or go with the x86_64 variant.
>
> I am considering Fedora 10, either i386 or x86_64.
>
> Does anyone have any comments or recommendations for which might be better to
> use, or if we would be better off using another distribution?
>
> Thanks!
> - Al Dorrington
>

I personally don't think the distro is all that important in this
respect. I'd pick the distro based on other things like how it gets
installed, how does it's package management, how often you want to
update it, whether you want configuration through GUI apps or whether
you're comfortable working at the command line, and probably most
important how well the user lists are run and whether the folks who
answer questions tend to be gentle or demanding.

I run the rt-kernel on Gentoo and have had relatively great success. I
don't know of any distro that won't run it, and if there is one then I
suspect that the rt-devel team would want to know that. I'm sure
Fedora is a well tested distro. The PlanetCCRMA audio distro is
Fedora-based and it has always worked pretty well.

As for i386 vs x86_64 my only input would be that if your app needs to
interface to a lot of Windows multimedia data then you're likely
better off with i386. I run the rt-kernel on both under Gentoo and
have an easier time with the i386 boxes decoding what are generally
Windows only media types.

Good luck with whatever decision you take.

Cheers,
Mark

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-09 13:49 Fedora 10 as basis for RT? Al Dorrington
2009-04-09 14:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-04-09 14:45 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2009-04-09 15:12   ` Al Dorrington
2009-04-09 18:06 ` Clark Williams
2009-04-09 19:38 ` Darren Hart
2009-04-10 17:28 ` Al Dorrington
2009-04-10 18:21   ` Mark Knecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b0904090745k675acde6v51df7dae4ac433d9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=markknecht@gmail.com \
    --cc=albert.dorrington@lmco.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).