From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Al Dorrington <albert.dorrington@lmco.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fedora 10 as basis for RT?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:21:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0904101121h3d909fcdhdae4642741eea951@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090410T171457-788@post.gmane.org>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Al Dorrington
<albert.dorrington@lmco.com> wrote:
> Ok - one more question about Fedora 10...
>
> Fedora 10 uses the 2.6.27 kernel, looking at the patches available at the RT
> kernel project site at kernel.org, I see patches for 2.6.26 and 2.6.29.
>
> I am not sure what the correct way to integrate the RT patches at this point.
> Are there alternate patch sites, or should I downgrade to 2.6.26 or upgrade to
> 2.6.29?
>
> Thanks - Al
>
If it's your first time with the rt-kernel then you should download
the 3 file set that Thomas announces for each kernel. One thing you do
NOT want to do is mix and match in ways that the rt-developers don't
suggest. Note that the rt-kernel should always (AFAIK) be built only
against the kernel.org kernel with the same base revision number.
Here's a recent announcement:
<QUOTE>
We are pleased to announce the next update to our new preempt-rt
series.
- include the futex rework + requeue_pi support (Darren Hart)
The futex changes need profound testing. As we know from prior futex
work the best stress tests for the futex interface are RT-Java-VMs
especially with enterprise work loads on larger machines. Can the
folks who have access to such monstrosities please unleash the beasts
and give the futex code a good work out ? Please tell your sysadmin
upfront that he should be stand by to fix up the resulting wreckage
which might vary from harmless to system replacement.
Unfortunately I was not able to track down the weird 32bit PAE
shutdown crash, so the affected users need to stick to the
nosmp-alternatives work around for now.
Download locations:
http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
Information on the RT patch can be found at:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
to build the 2.6.29.1-rt5 tree, the following patches should be
applied:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.29.1.tar.bz2
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.29.1-rt5.bz2
The broken out patches are also available at the same download
locations.
Enjoy !
tglx
</QUOTE>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-10 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 13:49 Fedora 10 as basis for RT? Al Dorrington
2009-04-09 14:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-04-09 14:45 ` Mark Knecht
2009-04-09 15:12 ` Al Dorrington
2009-04-09 18:06 ` Clark Williams
2009-04-09 19:38 ` Darren Hart
2009-04-10 17:28 ` Al Dorrington
2009-04-10 18:21 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b0904101121h3d909fcdhdae4642741eea951@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=albert.dorrington@lmco.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).