From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Knecht Subject: Re: Best gcc flags? Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:27:34 -0800 Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b1001231427k26a030ep4c15ceb918201849@mail.gmail.com> References: <5bdc1c8b1001221054g406baa9cp226a478be7342c0e@mail.gmail.com> <520f0cf11001221409t2eda34e6kae393afde012d6fc@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b1001221458j74d36fdbl3f154f8b539791dd@mail.gmail.com> <4B5B57F6.3050304@cauwe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: John Kacur , RT To: Xavier Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f190.google.com ([209.85.222.190]:41240 "EHLO mail-pz0-f190.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053Ab0AWW1f (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:27:35 -0500 Received: by pzk28 with SMTP id 28so885996pzk.4 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:27:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5B57F6.3050304@cauwe.org> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Xavier Miller wrote: > Hello, > > Don't play with CFLAGS/LDFLAGS. -march=native will let GCC find the best > (and most sable) options for your compiler. > Playing with unsafe CFLAGS/LDFLAGS will produce unstable system, hard to > debug. > > Kind regards, > Xavier Miller. > thanks. That's the direction I went. Trying to bring up X now. When it's up I'll start working on adding rt-sources. Cheers, Mark