From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt-tests release tarball location
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:17:43 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6569931b-16e5-5965-dfd0-7ffdf80fffab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h66b2c6m.fsf@kurt.kurt.home>
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> On Sat Dec 28 2024, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am one of the co-maintainers of Buildroot, an embedded Linux build
> > system. Among many other packages, we obviously have rt-tests as one of
> > our packages. When rt-tests is built, we download it from kernel.org.
> > Unfortunately, the rt-tests tarballs are moved around: the latest
> > release is available at https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/rt-tests/,
> > but as soon as another newer release is available, the older release
> > tarballs get moved to
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/rt-tests/older/.
> >
> > This breaks the build for build systems such as Buildroot, that expect
> > a release tarball to stay at a given location, and not being moved
> > around.
> >
> > Would it possible to keep the tarballs at the same location? Either by
> > not having the older/ folder entirely, or by populating it immediately
> > with the latest release, so that all releases are always available from
> > the older/ folder?
>
> +1
>
> For Gentoo I had to add both URLs to SRC_URI in the ebuilds. It first
> tries rt-tests/ and then rt-tests/older/ location, which is also not
> ideal.
Why is it not ideal? This seems like a perfectly reasonable solution?
John
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-28 10:43 rt-tests release tarball location Thomas Petazzoni
2025-01-07 9:41 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-01-07 14:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-01-08 18:21 ` John Kacur
2025-01-08 19:05 ` Crystal Wood
2025-01-09 8:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-01-09 10:13 ` Tomas Glozar
2025-01-09 10:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-01-09 12:04 ` Jörg Sommer
2025-01-10 16:46 ` John Kacur
2025-08-13 21:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2025-08-18 19:18 ` John Kacur
2025-08-18 19:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2025-01-08 18:17 ` John Kacur [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6569931b-16e5-5965-dfd0-7ffdf80fffab@redhat.com \
--to=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox