From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "E-Blokos" Subject: Re: Plan to support RT on 3.8 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: <66EBDBF9E9BE41EDB669191411467716@e1705> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Return-path: Received: from node250.e-blokos.com ([67.205.80.138]:44176 "EHLO node250.e-blokos.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751835Ab3ASAEh (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:04:37 -0500 Received: from e1705 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by node250.e-blokos.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id r0J04U49009619 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:04:31 -0500 Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Gleixner" To: "Jain Priyanka-B32167" Cc: "Carsten Emde" ; "Steven Rostedt" ; ; "Dev Manish-R65866" Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:55 PM Subject: Re: Plan to support RT on 3.8 > Jain, > > please do not take this reply as a personal affront! > > This is solely about the impertinence of your employer as I have > already ignored _three_ private mails with the same topic originated > from Freescale management folks. > > Though, I'm happy that you've been obviously forced by the same people > which I ignored to send this mail. Otherwise I wouldn't have been able > to give a public response. > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Jain Priyanka-B32167 wrote: > >> We are planning for our next BSP. For that. We would like to use >> Linux kernel 3.8. >> >> It would be really helpful if you can please share the plan of RT >> support on 3.8 kernel. >> >> When can the release be expected? > > I think I've made it entirely clear in the past, that these stupid > roadmap and release plan questions are annoying as hell. > > See: http://bit.ly/XJF0em > > I'm really amazed by the chuzpa of Freescale management folks to > demand information from an Open Source project solely for the sake of > Freescale business decisions. > > I would not mind such a demand from someone who actively fosters the > development of this project (either by providing substantial man power > or by sustainably funding it), but it seems that none of the managers > at Freescale noticed my recent observations about participation on > PREEMPT_RT. > > See: https://lwn.net/Articles/524329/ > and https://lwn.net/Articles/232379/ > > > Just to make it clear: > > - Neither I nor anyone else in the PREEMPT_RT community has any > interest in Freescale business decisions. > > - I personally detest the abuse of Freescale engineers who are > involved with this project to be forced to gain information which > their managers could not get. > > - I call out Freescale management folks to explain why they think > that Open Source free-riding entitles them to demand anything from > the community. > > Thanks, > > tglx > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. Why Freescale corporation didn'et make any donation to RT open source project already if they need RT super developers ? :o) Seems that human nature wants always pervert freedom for their profits.... -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.