From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haris Okanovic Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] timers: Don't search for expired timers while TIMER_SOFTIRQ is scheduled Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:37:49 -0600 Message-ID: <7079102c-f53b-e8ab-c54d-1c40ff21d921@ni.com> References: <20170803210657.19179-1-haris.okanovic@ni.com> <20170803210657.19179-2-haris.okanovic@ni.com> <28f05e39-6bc6-99c5-e1bc-91be3e79ea78@ni.com> <13c06708-f7ad-4f46-1c0b-f12d1ca16beb@ni.com> <20180301164755.pipco45y5nlvmdsy@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, julia.cartwright@ni.com, gratian.crisan@ni.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180301164755.pipco45y5nlvmdsy@linutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On 03/01/2018 10:47 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2018-03-01 09:49:59 [-0600], Haris Okanovic wrote: >> *bump* Has anyone looked into this? > > I'm lost. > It entered the kernel in v4.9.9-rt6 and left in v4.9.30-rt20 once we > figured out that there is something wrong with it. It was added back into 4.9 at some point after v4.9.30-rt20. I see an older version in v4.9.68-rt60, for example, hence my original email. It was dropped sometime thereafter, presumably because it no longer cleanly applies. I don't see it in v4.14.20-rt17, for example. > Is it still in a RT tree somewhere? I can't draw an exact timeline, since rt history is hard to follow. I don't think so. > Is there a newer patch pending on your side? Not yet. The latest version on patchwork is OK, just needs to be rebased post-4.9. I'll post a new version when I get a chance to build and retest it. > > Sebastian >