From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Dahl Subject: Re: kernel 4.9.39 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:18:03 +0200 Message-ID: <7139918.Kz6vm8i5iO@ada> References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.thorsis.com ([213.211.200.15]:49331 "EHLO mail.thorsis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751578AbdITIXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 04:23:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.thorsis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EB23A2214 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:18:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.thorsis.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.thorsis.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0QKj6aEi0zfS for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:18:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hei hei, Am Dienstag, 19. September 2017, 23:13:56 CEST schrieb Brian Wrenn: > foreseeable future, we only can use 4.9.34 or 4.9.39. I looked on the > PREEMPT-RT site's list of patches, but I don't see one for either of > those versions. Just for the sake of trying, I attempted to patch > 4.9.39 with 4.9.40-rt30, but to no surprise that failed. > > Do I have any other options? Does a non-published PREEMPT-RT patch > that would successfully patch 4.9.39 exist somewhere I haven't looked? In Git I see tags for those version in the linux-rt-devel tree: v4.9.30-rt21-rebase v4.9.33-rt23-rebase And those in the linux-stable-rt tree: v4.9.35-rt25-rebase And there are even non-rebased tags for 4.9.34 and 4.9.39, maybe you can export a working patch stack just from Git? Greets Alex