From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail.thorsis.com ([92.198.35.195]:59422 "EHLO mail.thorsis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728035AbeGaPrn (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:47:43 -0400 From: Alexander Dahl Subject: Re: How to apply RT patches to a kernel not listed in http://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.9/older/ Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:07:09 +0200 Message-ID: <8426606.ZxYD7UXQP7@ada> In-Reply-To: References: <4333850.dc08gExWjP@ada> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Cc: Patrick Doyle Hello, Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 09:49:20 CEST schrieb Patrick Doyle: > I guess I have always assumed that the linux-at91 tree was more > betterer for the SAMA5 than the vanilla tree. But I have never asked > what makes it better. I do admire and applaud Atmel/Microchip's > commitment to getting their changes mainlined. They do, although also a lot seems to come from the engineers at Bootlin? If you're aiming at SAMA5: I have a look at linux-arm-kernel every now and then and there's still a lot of ongoing development for that target. Maybe LTS vanilla v4.14 with the PREEMPT_RT patches is also an option for you? HTH and Greets Alex