From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFA9C4741F for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D56C221F9 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="cO2ZF0ww"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ktTTc5QE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729620AbgKDLRt (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 06:17:49 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:48670 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729616AbgKDLRd (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 06:17:33 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1604488648; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1lc46Rd9wCuf9yAM3x0VKjRoapHGrztvOKUbPr8Ji7E=; b=cO2ZF0wwv9S0cKsVczS3IlOIfnKxt1HkxQVk5uvfxYDhOuVYIWxSGp1kuFtWX76T18qsjX hB7J94xcYaJqB+ORmCbkLyhQfKnxqQDUDVuxZgafVeyEtEpTZS1Yu/RCPv0c/ftZRLoi4B gFxgkCBSyTfMADAUDhKcg43UfS550sNrwxtf8s1J3LKE0uKeYaTNDm/nkYO+hp3xP5Qn0k Qc7p+FEa30cjAjyOdb0Zm9Zmc4VuE3+v7XgtO9Be9RWAm9b5e8BabDp52zLkSQja76bBvK H+/YEPEqq84hMi52VV3kNBTzaRg3D89YWqT6GDKVLLGXHaArGwcafPgBPILTXQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1604488648; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1lc46Rd9wCuf9yAM3x0VKjRoapHGrztvOKUbPr8Ji7E=; b=ktTTc5QEuhm/ecR+uDBY6KbenTPsRh9aO5iQN0v/VhZwDpxz4ozua95XP7fQfPtYQ9mbeM Dn5AlhgWk5shKsCA== To: Mike Galbraith , Gratian Crisan , Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Brandon Streiff , Ingo Molnar , Darren Hart , James Minor , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: BUG_ON(!newowner) in fixup_pi_state_owner() In-Reply-To: <874km5mnbf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> References: <87a6w6x7bb.fsf@ni.com> <878sbixbk4.fsf@ni.com> <2376f4e71c638aee215a4911e5efed14c5adf56e.camel@gmx.de> <5f536491708682fc3b86cb5b7bc1e05ffa3521e7.camel@gmx.de> <874km5mnbf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: <871rh9mkvr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 04 2020 at 11:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04 2020 at 08:42, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 01:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> --- a/kernel/futex.c >> +++ b/kernel/futex.c >> @@ -2383,7 +2383,18 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __us >> * Since we just failed the trylock; there must be an owner. >> */ >> newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex); >> - BUG_ON(!newowner); >> + >> + /* >> + * Why? Because I know what I'm doing with these beasts? Nope, >> + * but what the hell, a busy restart loop let f_boosted become >> + * owner, so go for it. Box still boots, works, no longer makes >> + * boom with fbomb_v2, and as an added bonus, didn't even blow >> + * futextests all up. Maybe it'll help... or not, we'll see. >> + */ >> + if (unlikely(!newowner)) { >> + err = -EAGAIN; >> + goto handle_err; > > Yes, that cures it, but does not really explain why newowner is > NULL. Lemme stare more. Aside of that it's going to create inconsistent state in the worst case. There is something really fishy in the trace Gratian provided....