From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F78A46B9F; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 17:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708365108; cv=none; b=B3jbMEYyaE4zutu68GkN5J5B2kHRok95xhVanYWOQAF+WhqODpiXJ9BTCHZqXOrZvIWdulfSIe9yNCcRPt2mIxNSEq6AafTUqQzxCFJRNyehxHV7nt3BNjm5hJc84yH5cUWHc0H/UbusWH6g7LTR4wIhMpr99JuUP8S6V2zrXsw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708365108; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dYphAmOqh6s/jX7EW/gPNGu1P1vMlwDQLwtH2msUveg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Rd83zSbUz0/tOvqH695RwYffMdh0j+nflcsE9qFYPvachimH6pLPOxLVc0U0gX8h5FIYvhzOZotX4RiTa8leRNhCkK3rXk2ZgbSw3PAXhvs1OGNXNW4GapOPK7hPjx4Hk74EwqYBQZURozQY/KtQD6jHBqO1TRlSK+7wJ0SKl7c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=bsTaV1rY; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=wUtETLf8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="bsTaV1rY"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="wUtETLf8" From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1708365104; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dYphAmOqh6s/jX7EW/gPNGu1P1vMlwDQLwtH2msUveg=; b=bsTaV1rYmYdP2h1KXHL2ba9PLm3Efm+FXmThu0i+m6SYG2f1khI/odAmR3xWkaq6LGmiXG h6lkXnG0NKO3BISN6uPVJNq9PNsuGDTDU6ctF1Xy8gbpNuGkZDvg0APWwrFJqTFq/vVE5L nDYfIhmE0k7BxElDbnT48ixtbDVeMfwTgwdJdaCV9Jp+We1v1TKhkGZ09TdHZkMHFvrAJn n/1mk0LbUGa3XWFMs+24P8IkgiA1d8ipuu0Mh107INSbHw2eao9xt235rol2AWLujnQ3r/ jMNpe96dZP4C2+8qA3HK3qfIiA40Eopd8ZhRQGAhYC7Va7k5PCKhjCH4nC553Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1708365104; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dYphAmOqh6s/jX7EW/gPNGu1P1vMlwDQLwtH2msUveg=; b=wUtETLf82/pvASroqcT1N9/D1spRI2R8TU02pFm73ty8dVg1dHSolYq1Lenu4KDWXlENWX UUXZsgI1GWVijMBg== To: "John B. Wyatt IV" Cc: Petr Mladek , Clark Williams , Juri Lelli , Derek Barbosa , Bruno Goncalves , "John B. Wyatt IV" , LKML , linux-rt-users Subject: Re: Automating console_blast.sh In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:57:23 +0106 Message-ID: <87frxo2vhg.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-02-19, "John B. Wyatt IV" wrote: > I am investigating if we can automate, and, possibly add > console_blash.sh [1] to our test suite here at Red Hat. It is called "console_blast.sh". ;-) > At Red Hat we use SSH to manage our test boxes. On an off-list email > you wrote that 'Only the UART should be used as a console'. I took > this as no ssh session should be used from the boot up until the > crash, but I should have confirmed this. Is this correct? SSH is fine. SSH sessions are not consoles. Consoles are specified with the console= or netconsole= boot argument and receive the kernel messages automatically from the kernel. > The license for our test suite is GPL v3 [2]. May we have your > permission to license it under that or permissive? Yes, GPL v3 is OK. > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/ZcQjxa4UA6hzXHnU@thinkpad2021/ > > [2] https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/tests/kernel/kernel-tests/-/tree/main/rt-tests John