From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Crystal Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rtmutex, pi_blocked_on, and blk_flush_plug()
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:49:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k00cr7ix.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+47FVJ+hI+NA2In@linutronix.de>
On Thu, Feb 16 2023 at 15:17, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2023-02-09 22:31:57 [-0600], Crystal Wood wrote:
>> It is possible for blk_flush_plug() to be called while
>> current->pi_blocked_on is set, in the process of trying to acquire an rwsem.
>> If the block flush blocks trying to acquire some lock, then it appears that
>> current->pi_blocked_on will be overwritten, and then set to NULL once that
>> lock is acquired, even though the task is still blocked on the original
>> rwsem. Am I missing something that deals with this situation? It seems
>> like the lock types that are supposed to call blk_flush_plug() should do so
>> before calling task_blocks_on_rt_mutex().
>
> Do you experience a problem in v6.1-RT?
>
>> I originally noticed this while investigating a related issue on an older
>> RHEL kernel where task_blocked_on_mutex() has a BUG_ON if entered with
>> current->pi_blocked_on non-NULL. Current kernels lack this check.
>
> The logic is different but the deadlock should be avoided:
> - mutex_t and rw_semaphore invoke schedule() while blocking on a lock.
> As part of schedule() sched_submit_work() is invoked.
> This is the same in RT and !RT so I don't expect any dead lock since
> the involved locks are the same.
Huch?
xlog_cil_commit()
down_read(&cil->xc_ctx_lock)
__rwbase_read_lock()
__rt_mutex_slowlock()
current->pi_blocked_on = ...
schedule()
__blk_flush_plug()
dd_insert_requests()
rt_spin_lock()
WARN_ON(current->pi_blocked_on);
So something like the below is required. But that might not cut it
completely. wq_worker_sleeping() is fine, but I'm not convinced that
io_wq_worker_sleeping() is safe. That needs some investigation.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6666,6 +6666,9 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(str
*/
SCHED_WARN_ON(current->__state & TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT);
+ if (current->pi_blocked_on)
+ return;
+
/*
* If we are going to sleep and we have plugged IO queued,
* make sure to submit it to avoid deadlocks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-20 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 4:31 rtmutex, pi_blocked_on, and blk_flush_plug() Crystal Wood
2023-02-16 14:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-02-16 15:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-02-20 9:49 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-02-20 11:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-02-20 11:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-02-20 18:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-05 5:39 ` Crystal Wood
2023-03-22 16:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-03-23 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k00cr7ix.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swood@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox