From: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 V2] rteval: Construct a 'model name' on architectures that don't have one
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:53:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuip9oea.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210912154538.255217-1-jkacur@redhat.com> (John Kacur's message of "Sun, 12 Sep 2021 11:45:38 -0400")
Hi John,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> writes:
> This is based on an idea from Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>
>
> On architectures that lack 'model name' in /proc/cpuinfo
> create 'model name' Unknown when creating the per core dictionaries
> in cpuinfo
>
> For arm, we can construct the 'model name' from the
> 'CPU implementer'
> 'CPU architecture'
> 'CPU variant'
> 'CPU part'
> 'CPU revision'
>
> Suggested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
> ---
> rteval/misc.py | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rteval/misc.py b/rteval/misc.py
> index 0dd361ff19fd..c1d2a972430d 100644
> --- a/rteval/misc.py
> +++ b/rteval/misc.py
> @@ -77,6 +77,27 @@ def cpuinfo():
> info[core] = {}
> continue
> info[core][key] = val
> +
> + for (core, pcdict) in info.items():
> + if not 'model name' in pcdict:
> + # On Arm CPU implementer is present
> + # Construct the model_name from the following fields
> + if 'CPU implementer' in pcdict:
> + model_name = [pcdict.get('CPU implementer')]
> + model_name.append(pcdict.get('CPU architecture'))
> + model_name.append(pcdict.get('CPU variant'))
> + model_name.append(pcdict.get('CPU part'))
> + model_name.append(pcdict.get('CPU revision', ''))
Is there a reason to use an empty default for "CPU revision" but not for
the other components? Maybe a left-over from original patch.
> +
> + # If a list item is None, remove it
> + model_name = [name for name in model_name if name]
> +
> + # Convert the model_name list into a string
> + model_name = " ".join(model_name)
> + pcdict['model name'] = model_name
> + else:
> + pcdict['model name'] = 'Unknown'
> +
> return info
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
With the above comment addressed, fwiw -
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>
Thanks,
Punit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-12 15:45 [PATCH 2/5 V2] rteval: Construct a 'model name' on architectures that don't have one John Kacur
2021-09-13 2:53 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2021-09-13 12:37 ` John Kacur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tuip9oea.fsf@stealth \
--to=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox