linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M. Koehrer" <mathias_koehrer@arcor.de>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mathias_koehrer@arcor.de
Cc: lclaudio@uudg.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Disabling lapic timer for a certain core
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:54:51 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8898.1267797291298.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail11.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003050659380.2014@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Thomas, 

thank you very much for the reply.
> Please do _NOT_ top post. Please reply inline and in context.
Sorry for that...

> > The issue is here, that the interrupt routine of the kernel
> > takes too long here.
> > It would be fine to have the timer interrupt called more 
> > often and to process with each call only a subset of the 
> > jobs to be done...
> > This would reduce the time the CPU the user mode 
> > is interrupted by the timer routine.
> 
> Err, by splitting the work you introduce even more overhead. That's
> the wrong approach. The first question is which timers are running on
> that CPU as you have isolated it.
You are right. The total overhead is of course larger.
However, the overhead that could appear within a single of our 40us loops
would be smaller. It is fine for me to have a 5us add on with each loop.
But it is not allowed to have a 15us add on with every 1000th loop...

> 
> In theory it's possible to remove the timer interrupt from such an
> isolated core completely, but there needs to be some work done vs. the
> scheduler, accounting, RCU etc. There are people looking into this,
> but we have no patches yet.
I have checked the LAPIC addresses via the MSRs.
All LAPIC addresses for all CPU cores are the same. 
I assume they share the very same configuration, thus a minimum step 
would be to make a copy of this configuration data and to let CPU core 3
point to this copy. This would allow to disable the timer.

 
> 
> What kind of application is that ? Data acquistion or closed loop
> processsing ?
I am running a close loop application.

Thank you very much.

Regards

Mathias

-- 
Mathias Koehrer
mathias_koehrer@arcor.de


Tolle Dekolletés oder scharfe Tatoos? Vote jetzt ... oder mach selbst mit und zeige Deine Schokoladenseite
bei Topp oder Hopp von Arcor: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.toh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-05 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-04 21:03 Re: Disabling lapic timer for a certain core M. Koehrer
2010-03-05  7:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-05 13:54 ` M. Koehrer [this message]
2010-03-06  9:18   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8898.1267797291298.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail11.arcor-online.net \
    --to=mathias_koehrer@arcor.de \
    --cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).