From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Ove Karlsen <ove.karlsen@paradoxuncreated.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.5-rt14
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:30:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91465.1352179845@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 03 Nov 2012 20:04:58 +0100." <50956ADA.6090108@paradoxuncreated.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1179 bytes --]
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 20:04:58 +0100, Ove Karlsen said:
> And have you given consideration to the fact that most distros and OS
> grow with some levels of bloat, and everyone can`t be an expert, so
> maybe one shold consider a (scheduler) queue for "bloat", and one queue
> for main app, so that even bloated distros can run with the jitteramount
> of a highly specialized distro? (for instance
> mainapp,service1,mainapp,service2,mainapp,service3), if bloat is on
> queue 2. Or is thins kind of thinking already in batch, or idle?
So how does the kernel know which one is your "main app", and which one is
"bloat"? Hint - you can't base it on "the main app is the one using OpenGL" or
similar rule, as there may be multiple processes doing that, and you may
consider one of them to be bloat - and *I* might consider that one to be the
*important* one. Or even your definition may change around during the day - if
you're running Doom3, an OpenGL-capable window manager is probably "bloat", but
once you exit Doom3 and start working with multiple windows again, suddenly
you're going to want that window manager to be the "important" process again...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 865 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 20:57 [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.5-rt14 Thomas Gleixner
2012-11-02 16:58 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-11-03 19:04 ` Ove Karlsen
2012-11-06 5:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91465.1352179845@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ove.karlsen@paradoxuncreated.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox