From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt-numa: ignore runtime cpumask if -a CPULIST is specified
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:08:45 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97ed969-a641-ae8d-3731-34fab5fab456@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfQzN4/oxz9o92Va@linutronix.de>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-01-28 12:44:14 [-0500], John Kacur wrote:
> > I agree that our current method is too restrictive, so I like the basic
> > idea here.
> >
> > I think we also need to differentiate between -a with no arguments
> > and -a all. -a with no arguments should inherit the cpumask from the
> > runtime environment but -a all, should be the same as specifying all the
> > cpus and ignoring the inherited cpumask.
>
> do you consider number of online CPUs to not deploy more threads than
> CPUs online in case some were shutdown?
Not sure I understand your question, but what I am saying is that we can
inherit a cpumask that has less cpus than cpus that are online. So in the
case of -a, just use the cpus available in the inherited cpumask
in the case of -a all, use all available cpus.
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > John
>
> Sebastian
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-21 14:16 [PATCH] rt-numa: optionally ignore runtime cpumask Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-21 18:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 12:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 16:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 16:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 16:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 17:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 17:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-25 18:40 ` [PATCH] rt-numa: ignore runtime cpumask if -a CPULIST is specified Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-25 18:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-26 7:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-28 17:44 ` John Kacur
2022-01-28 18:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-28 21:08 ` John Kacur [this message]
2022-01-28 18:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-28 21:11 ` John Kacur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97ed969-a641-ae8d-3731-34fab5fab456@redhat.com \
--to=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox