From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haris Okanovic Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] timers: Don't search for expired timers while TIMER_SOFTIRQ is scheduled Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:29:56 -0600 Message-ID: <98f4236e-9863-2af7-1170-51cd118f65bd@ni.com> References: <20170803210657.19179-1-haris.okanovic@ni.com> <20170803210657.19179-2-haris.okanovic@ni.com> <28f05e39-6bc6-99c5-e1bc-91be3e79ea78@ni.com> <13c06708-f7ad-4f46-1c0b-f12d1ca16beb@ni.com> <20180301164755.pipco45y5nlvmdsy@linutronix.de> <7079102c-f53b-e8ab-c54d-1c40ff21d921@ni.com> <20180302145232.anp4hz25uwqygopa@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, julia.cartwright@ni.com, gratian.crisan@ni.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180302145232.anp4hz25uwqygopa@linutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org > Could please point me to the code/patches or something? I rebase onto v4.14.20-rt17, running some sanity test before reposting to ml (cyclictest & Anna's timertest). Will post V4 sometime today (US Central Time) if everything goes well. Are you also asking for a 4.9 version? I'm fine leaving it out of 4.9. -- Haris On 03/02/2018 08:52 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2018-03-01 12:37:49 [-0600], Haris Okanovic wrote: >> It was added back into 4.9 at some point after v4.9.30-rt20. I see an older >> version in v4.9.68-rt60, for example, hence my original email. It was >> dropped sometime thereafter, presumably because it no longer cleanly >> applies. I don't see it in v4.14.20-rt17, for example. > > It was removed in v4.9.34-rt24 via 95d4a348841d ("Revert "timers: Don't > wake ktimersoftd on every tick""). I don't see any leftovers or an older > version. > Looking at the queue I see two patches from you and that is: > timers: Don't wake ktimersoftd on every tick > tpm_tis: fix stall after iowrite*()s > > and the former is reverted. This was v4.9.84-rt62 that I've been looking > at. Could please point me to the code/patches or something? > >>> Is there a newer patch pending on your side? >> >> Not yet. The latest version on patchwork is OK, just needs to be rebased >> post-4.9. I'll post a new version when I get a chance to build and retest >> it. > okay. > > Sebastian >