From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org>
Subject: 2.6.33-7-rt30 and 2.6.38 comparison
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:15:05 -0400
Message-ID: <A6776582C86F4789A74E5A2A2B57080E@e1705>
References: <4D71668F.9050201@windriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ip-67-205-80-138.static.privatedns.com ([67.205.80.138]:59680
	"EHLO node250.e-blokos.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756854Ab1CRUPH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:15:07 -0400
Received: from e1705 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by node250.e-blokos.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id p2IKF59X005372
	for <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:15:06 -0400
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>

Just tried to compare real time app
at work with 2.6.33.7-rt30 and 2.6.38 and
the result is 2.6.38 is very impressive...