From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Daniel James <daniel@64studio.com>
Cc: jordan <triplesquarednine@gmail.com>,
Gautam Thaker <gautam.h.thaker@lmco.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "yum install ...." based instruction on building a RT kernel.
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:10:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikBynRZ470Cv2ot3sCCjHGLU+L6EZ2shyP3oeGe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C936152.5000505@64studio.com>
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Daniel James <daniel@64studio.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>> There is something called Planet CCRMA, which is a set of
>> repositories for audio packages that run on RedHat, Fedora and CentOS.
>> They also package the real-time kernel in rpm form.
>
> Ready-packaged RT kernels make sense for JACK users with generic PCs,
> who may not be all that interested in optimisation (at first). They just
> want to be able to install a program like Ardour and have it run
> glitch-free.
>
> Being a release or two behind the bleeding edge is no bad thing for that
> type of user either - if (for instance) 2.6.31-rt works fine in a
> production audio system, there's no big hurry to change it and
> potentially break stuff. For that sort of user, high availability is
> much more important than squeezing every last drop of performance out of
> the hardware.
>
> In audio recording, we're potentially capturing once-in-a-lifetime or
> one-time-ever events, particularly since the industry focus has shifted
> from the studio to the live stage - whether TV, stadium or festival,
> that's where the artists are making their living these days. Even
> festivals run to tight schedules, with only 15 minutes allowed to switch
> between acts, including moving all the gear and repatching it. You can't
> ask the band to go and get a beer while you recompile your kernel :-)
Well, you've certainly slayed a straw man there. Just because I said it would
be good for people to compile their own kernels doesn't mean I meant
for them to do it on stage! Btw, I quite enjoy studio64, feel free to
update our rtwiki
with information about it.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-16 22:54 "yum install ...." based instruction on building a RT kernel Gautam Thaker
2010-09-17 6:08 ` jordan
2010-09-17 7:08 ` John Kacur
2010-09-17 12:38 ` Daniel James
2010-09-17 13:06 ` Bernardo Barros
2010-09-17 15:25 ` EXTERNAL: " Gautam Thaker
2010-09-18 19:34 ` jordan
2010-09-17 13:10 ` John Kacur [this message]
2010-09-18 19:24 ` jordan
2010-09-19 15:49 ` Clark Williams
2010-09-19 17:23 ` jordan
2010-09-19 19:20 ` Bernardo Barros
2010-09-19 20:00 ` jordan
2010-10-17 15:20 ` jordan
2010-10-18 6:16 ` John Kacur
2010-10-18 7:12 ` jordan
2010-09-18 19:15 ` jordan
2010-09-18 20:06 ` jordan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikBynRZ470Cv2ot3sCCjHGLU+L6EZ2shyP3oeGe@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@64studio.com \
--cc=gautam.h.thaker@lmco.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=triplesquarednine@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).