From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jordan Subject: Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1? Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:05:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CDAF425.4050800@ccrma.stanford.edu> <4CDC0429.8090506@gmail.com> <1289515742.14141.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ng Oon-Ee , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Niccol=F2_Belli?= , Thomas Gleixner , Fernando Lopez-Lezcano , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" , johnstul@us.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, npiggin@suse.de To: Bernardo Barros Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:52807 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753872Ab0KLAFu (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:05:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: hehehe, > I'm trying to install the 2.6.36-bfs here, let's see what happens.. :-) i know what happens at my end. - i can use 2.6.36 for RT type tasks, as i set that kernel up 2 days ago. im still holding onto 2.6.35 though, as it is my best kernel, has my Wacom running, and rgba. So far though, 2.6.36 seems not too much different from 2.6.35 for my pro-audio usage. I may wait for 2.6.37-bfs before i re-install Wacom, rgba, etc. (or PREEMPT_RT, once i actually here of a patch being available, i hope soonish) BFS is good enough for now though. jordan