linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pradyumna Sampath <pradysam@gmail.com>
To: Armin Steinhoff <armin@steinhoff.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fast interprocess communication ?
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:29:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTil7jag53q4on2xuxYOqISub3RRrNiSNkGCatKW1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C320CF1.7080803@steinhoff.de>

Hi Armin,

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Armin Steinhoff <armin@steinhoff.de> wrote:

> Local message exchange between lokal processes in less than 10us.

As per my measurements, mqueue meets this criteria. It was compared
with a test suite which ran against _a_popular_commercial_rtos_ and
RT_PREEMPT linux and the performance was equally good on both. Like I
said, the problem was the accuracy of the timeouts (mq_timedrecieve
and mq_timedsend) which is now fixed and mainlined.

regards
/prady

--
http://www.prady.in

      reply	other threads:[~2010-07-06 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-11 14:42 PREEMPT_RT patch vs RTAI/Xenomai Asier Tamayo
2010-05-11 15:20 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-05-11 15:30   ` Asier Tamayo
2010-05-12 16:07     ` Steven Rostedt
     [not found]       ` <4BEAFB7E.90304@steinhoff.de>
2010-05-13  1:27         ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-05-13  8:07           ` Armin Steinhoff
2010-05-13  8:01       ` Armin Steinhoff
2010-05-13 17:58         ` Robert Schwebel
2010-05-14  9:34           ` Armin Steinhoff
2010-05-14 11:46             ` Robert Schwebel
2010-05-14 12:32               ` Armin Steinhoff
2010-05-14 16:36                 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-05-14 16:29                   ` Armin Steinhoff
2010-05-14 20:53                     ` Robert Schwebel
2010-06-30 11:33               ` fast interprocess communication ? Armin Steinhoff
2010-06-30 11:39                 ` Pradyumna Sampath
2010-07-05 16:48                   ` Armin Steinhoff
2010-07-06 10:29                     ` Pradyumna Sampath [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTil7jag53q4on2xuxYOqISub3RRrNiSNkGCatKW1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pradysam@gmail.com \
    --cc=armin@steinhoff.de \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).