From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: David Runge <dave@sleepmap.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: v6.0.3-rt12 does not compile (WAS: [ANNOUNCE] v6.1-rc2-rt1)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:01:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1osx2Iw0qs3gWxu@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1m0MXDKt0yqXdsu@hmbx>
Please keep the list in Cc:
On 2022-10-27 00:26:45 [+0200], David Runge wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi David,
> I'm following the linux-rt development for the Arch Linux package [1].
> With 6.0.3-rt12 I have run into a bit of a pickle though.
I released it the other as the last one for the v6.0 series. Didn't
announce it officially since I made no RT relevant change.
> I'm seeing:
>
> ```
> drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c: In function ‘axienet_get_stats64’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c:1308:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq’; did you mean ‘u64_stats_fetch_begin’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 1308 | start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&lp->rx_stat_sync);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | u64_stats_fetch_begin
> drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c:1311:18: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq’; did you mean ‘u64_stats_fetch_retry’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 1311 | } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&lp->rx_stat_sync, start));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | u64_stats_fetch_retry
> ```
I addressed this for the v6.1 release, wasn't aware that it also managed
its way into the v6.0 series.
> Grepping for either ‘u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq’, or
> ‘u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq’ in the codebase, they are indeed the only
> occurences of it in that file... which is strange.
Well, we are working on getting rid of this function. Upstream should
follow in ~v6.2.
> ```
> rg u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq
> drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c
> 1308: start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&lp->rx_stat_sync);
> 1314: start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&lp->tx_stat_sync);
> ```
>
> If I check our own kernel or Greg's v6.0.3 tag there are plenty of
> occurences of the function all across the codebase, but not as soon as
> the patchset is merged.
There is
0002-net-Remove-the-obsolte-u64_stats_fetch_-_irq-users.patch
which gets rid of drivers/net users and then there is
u64_stat-Remove-the-obsolete-fetch_irq-variants.patch
which removes the API once all users are gone.
> When doing the release for 6.0.0-rt11 I already noticed a few missing
> options but was under the impression that they might be missing due to
> the realtime options disabling them. However, now it looks as if there
> are entire subsets missing oO
> Does the patchset drop a lot of network driver code and/or do the last
> occurences there also have to be removed?
> As is, I am unable to build v6.0.3-rt12.
I'm going to release -rt13 in a bit with this fixed.
There are few options like SLAB or TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE which are not
available on PREEMPT_RT for one reason or another. I try to avoid
dropping options if possible.
> Best,
> David
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 15:18 [ANNOUNCE] v6.1-rc2-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <Y1m0MXDKt0yqXdsu@hmbx>
2022-10-27 7:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-11-15 17:07 ` v6.0.3-rt12 does not compile (WAS: [ANNOUNCE] v6.1-rc2-rt1) David Runge
2022-11-17 7:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1osx2Iw0qs3gWxu@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave@sleepmap.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox