RE: [PATCH] softirq: wake up ktimer thread in softirq context

Chang, Junxiao
2023-02-20T08:55:18Z

Thank you for handling this, modified patch looks good to me.

Regards,
Junxiao

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2023 1:30 AM
To: Chang, Junxiao <junxiao.chang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org; tglx@linutronix.de; rostedt@goodmis.org; Peh, Hock Zhang <hock.zhang.peh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: wake up ktimer thread in softirq context

On 2022-12-08 15:56:04 [+0800], Junxiao Chang wrote:
> Occiaionally timer interrupt might be triggered in softirq context,
> ktimer thread should be woken up with RT kernel, or else ktimer thread
> might stay in sleep state although timer interrupt has been triggered.
>
> This change fixes a latency issue that timer handler is delayed for
> more than 4ms in network related test.

Sorry for keeping you waiting. Your observation and patch is correct. I'm going to apply a slightly modified version of the patch (see below) after I reworded the commit message on Monday.

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c index ab1fe34326bab..82f3e68fbe220 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -664,13 +664,12 @@ static inline void __irq_exit_rcu(void) #endif
account_hardirq_exit(current);
preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
- if (!in_interrupt()) {
- if (local_softirq_pending())
- invoke_softirq();
+ if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
+ invoke_softirq();

- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && local_pending_timers())
- wake_timersd();
- }
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && local_pending_timers() &&
+ !(in_nmi() | in_hardirq()))
+ wake_timersd();

tick_irq_exit();
}

Sebastian