From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Linux-RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwbase: Prevent indefinite writer starvation
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:28:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8lvwKHmmnikVDgk@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119110220.kphftcehehhi5l5u@techsingularity.net>
On 2023-01-19 11:02:20 [+0000], Mel Gorman wrote:
> > - Once the writer removes READER_BIAS, it forces the reader into the
> > slowpath.
>
> Removed in __rwbase_write_trylock IIUC
And added back in case try trylock failed via __rwbase_write_unlock().
The RTmutex is unlocked and the READER_BIAS is "returned".
> > At that time the writer does not own the wait_lock meaning
> > the reader _could_ check the timeout before writer had a chance to set
> > it. The worst thing is probably that if jiffies does not have the
> > highest bit set then it will always disable the reader bias here.
> > The easiest thing is probably to check timeout vs 0 and ensure on the
> > writer side that the lowest bit is always set (in the unlikely case it
> > will end up as zero).
> >
>
> I am missing something important. On the read side, we have
>
Look at this side by side:
writer reader
| static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
| unsigned int state)
| {
| /* Force readers into slow path */
| atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &rwb->readers);
| static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
| unsigned int state)
| {
| struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
| int ret;
|
| raw_spin_lock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
Reader has the lock, writer will wait.
| /*
| * Allow readers, as long as the writer has not completely
| * acquired the semaphore for write.
| */
| if (atomic_read(&rwb->readers) != WRITER_BIAS) {
here, the timeout value is not yet populated by the writer so the reader
compares vs 0.
| atomic_inc(&rwb->readers);
| raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
| return 0;
| }
|
| raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
| if (__rwbase_write_trylock(rwb))
| goto out_unlock;
|
Hope this makes it easier.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-17 8:38 [PATCH v2] locking/rwbase: Prevent indefinite writer starvation Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20230117105031.2512-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2023-01-17 12:18 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-17 14:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-01-17 16:50 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-18 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-01-18 16:00 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-18 15:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-01-18 17:31 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-19 8:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-01-19 11:02 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-19 16:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2023-01-19 17:41 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-19 17:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-01-19 17:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-01-20 8:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-01-20 13:24 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-20 13:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-01-20 14:07 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-20 15:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8lvwKHmmnikVDgk@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox