From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EF4C433F5 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 06:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233039AbiC2Gcd (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 02:32:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232190AbiC2Gcd (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 02:32:33 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FE71959CC; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 23:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:30:45 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1648535447; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BPMbslHvcWl9AuG65q7i4FLjo8NvVN67J002+wav/FY=; b=z5k01oUOKZTixIWULLUcr508q/nMMT4tEEjUge5ZQhzBEYr5bPRwiQs5vJj69dJ8aKWe0l jS8wDg+MxF5n3WIOpjYprknAz/fsRet90+HfSfbSpsXDmQz8PHqwVbo5tp/crRjl8EvIAx rZhQ9IxuO6UVMLbFCJsH6IWU7PFRCUUA0GjlXNDWXQFsbJeclC6zdaQLTIYNmz/2sxskDr aWELyVDtoySPAKA7Dzz4wvMzsDOzuChceYIe/QRlTD2wnf2ANI6RCFPgiZ8NdmZY1MwYXA IF6jphQxssXXlq5Idttg7mrH3MOnpCJjfSRUI3J/uL0fki1lgqnz04LPhr4X2Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1648535447; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BPMbslHvcWl9AuG65q7i4FLjo8NvVN67J002+wav/FY=; b=GQrvXCOItrac/je83cPCtN63EkGHkvcRnczk/iwqe7CV0yuSFNYWm+SEQQ7E05EByC9PsT itHjLIsLol12wLCg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Tejun Heo Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , Rasmus Villemoes , Peter Hurley , Lai Jiangshan , Esben Haabendal , Steven Walter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel , Pengutronix Kernel Team , =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Pribil , Jiri Slaby , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] RT scheduling policies for workqueues Message-ID: References: <20220323145600.2156689-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20220328100927.5ax34nea7sp7jdsy@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On 2022-03-28 07:39:25 [-1000], Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I wonder whether it'd be useful to provide a set of wrappers which can make > switching between workqueue and kworker easy. Semantics-wise, they're > already mostly aligned and it shouldn't be too difficult to e.g. make an > unbounded workqueue be backed by a dedicated kthread_worker instead of > shared pool depending on a flag, or even allow switching dynamically. This could work. For the tty layer it could use 'lowlatency' attribute to decide which implementation makes sense. > Thanks. > Sebastian