* [PATCH] rt-tests: oslat should use MHz, not Mhz
@ 2024-02-01 16:05 Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-02 16:33 ` John Kacur
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2024-02-01 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users; +Cc: Newman, Chuck, John Kacur
Usage of Mhz, in oslat, is incorrect:
From https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/writing-si-metric-system-units#:~:text=NOT%20250%20mms.-,Capitalization,the%20beginning%20of%20the%20sentence:
"When the unit is derived from the name of a person, the symbol or the first letter of the symbol is an uppercase letter (W for the unit "watt" or Pa for the unit "pascal")."
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Chuck Newman <chuck.newman@hpe.com>
diff --git a/src/oslat/oslat.c b/src/oslat/oslat.c
index 4bdca64..e398f20 100644
--- a/src/oslat/oslat.c
+++ b/src/oslat/oslat.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void write_summary(struct thread *t)
calculate(t);
putfield("Core", t[i].core_i, "d", "");
- putfield("Counter Freq", t[i].counter_mhz, "u", " (Mhz)");
+ putfield("Counter Freq", t[i].counter_mhz, "u", " (MHz)");
for (j = 0; j < g.bucket_size; j++) {
if (j < g.bucket_size-1 && g.output_omit_zero_buckets) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: oslat should use MHz, not Mhz
2024-02-01 16:05 [PATCH] rt-tests: oslat should use MHz, not Mhz Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2024-02-02 16:33 ` John Kacur
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Kacur @ 2024-02-02 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: linux-rt-users, Newman, Chuck
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Usage of Mhz, in oslat, is incorrect:
>
> From https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/writing-si-metric-system-units#:~:text=NOT%20250%20mms.-,Capitalization,the%20beginning%20of%20the%20sentence:
>
> "When the unit is derived from the name of a person, the symbol or the first letter of the symbol is an uppercase letter (W for the unit "watt" or Pa for the unit "pascal")."
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Chuck Newman <chuck.newman@hpe.com>
>
> diff --git a/src/oslat/oslat.c b/src/oslat/oslat.c
> index 4bdca64..e398f20 100644
> --- a/src/oslat/oslat.c
> +++ b/src/oslat/oslat.c
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void write_summary(struct thread *t)
> calculate(t);
>
> putfield("Core", t[i].core_i, "d", "");
> - putfield("Counter Freq", t[i].counter_mhz, "u", " (Mhz)");
> + putfield("Counter Freq", t[i].counter_mhz, "u", " (MHz)");
>
> for (j = 0; j < g.bucket_size; j++) {
> if (j < g.bucket_size-1 && g.output_omit_zero_buckets) {
>
>
>
Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-02 16:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-01 16:05 [PATCH] rt-tests: oslat should use MHz, not Mhz Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-02 16:33 ` John Kacur
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox