From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:23:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <1250983671.5688.21.camel@raz> <1251004897.7043.70.camel@marge.simson.net> <1251018551.3810.35.camel@raz> <1251012621.14003.71.camel@marge.simson.net> <1251025557.3810.65.camel@raz> <1251021133.14003.172.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: raz ben yehuda , riel@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, andrew motron , wiseman@macs.biu.ac.il, lkml , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Galbraith Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1251021133.14003.172.camel@marge.simson.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote: > The rest, I'll leave off replying to, we're kinda splitting hairs. I > don't see a big generic benefit to OFFSCHED or ilk, others do. No we are not splitting hairs. OFFSCHED takes the OS noise (interrupts, timers, RCU, cacheline stealing etc etc) out of certain processors. You cannot run an undisturbed piece of software on the OS right now.