From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@gmail.com>,
"Gary S. Robertson" <gary.robertson@linaro.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cyclictest: remove compatibilty hack for old libnuma, repairs "-a" for isolcpus
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:54:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505202153100.4225@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1505201629400.7867@riemann>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 742 bytes --]
On Wed, 20 May 2015, John Kacur wrote:
> This is a terrible hack, but I'm afraid to remove it yet.
> Even systems as recent as Fedora 19 have a libnuma less than that.
> pm -qf /usr/lib64/libnuma.so
> numactl-devel-2.0.8-4.fc19.x86_64
> [jkacur@riemann rt-tests]$ cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
>
> This is causing problems for people who want to pin threads to
> CPUs isolated with isolcpus=, so we do need to do something about.
>
> I could perhaps accept an improved hack that tests whether the hack itself
> is needed, until we have a better solution.
I'm not a great fan of it, but I think that rt-tests really needs
proper automake with proper tests for various bits and pieces.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150427173222.04e8a1b1@md1em3qc>
2015-04-27 17:58 ` rt-tests, cyclictest libnuma and isolcpus Clark Williams
2015-05-20 12:58 ` [PATCH] cyclictest: remove compatibilty hack for old libnuma, repairs "-a" for isolcpus Henning Schild
2015-05-20 14:38 ` John Kacur
2015-05-20 19:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
[not found] ` <CAONaPpGpzzgjxQh+214cfOBVrqeX_yX=Kh981YyveHhTgyLA4A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-21 11:23 ` John Kacur
2015-05-21 11:11 ` Henning Schild
2015-05-21 12:23 ` Staffan Tjernstrom
2015-05-21 14:19 ` Henning Schild
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1505202153100.4225@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=gary.robertson@linaro.org \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=jkacur@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox