From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Tracy Smith <tlsmith3777@gmail.com>
Cc: "bigeasy@linutronix.de" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Patel, Vedang" <vedang.patel@intel.com>,
"julia@ni.com" <julia@ni.com>,
"ranshalit@gmail.com" <ranshalit@gmail.com>,
"linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hart, Darren" <darren.hart@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Regression on rt kernel while using POSIX timers
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:51:37 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703031733570.4522@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472B70D9-E1AF-4D14-BE79-ABAAC74BA4DB@gmail.com>
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Tracy Smith wrote:
First of all, please do not top post and trim your replies.
> Pleaee isolate the specific release where latency regression occurred if
> the community has not already done so.
Which regression are you talking about?
> Possibly backing out changes specific to timers and posix threads for
> that release to see what impacted latency.
The issue Vedang and Sebastian are discussing is a configuration
problem. Backing out changes should really solve that.
> This is crucial for NXP and others as they migrate to later releases of
> the kernel.
Thanks for the enlightment, we really were unaware about the crucial
importance.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-08 18:41 Regression on rt kernel while using POSIX timers Patel, Vedang
2017-02-10 19:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-02-13 18:48 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-02-15 16:54 ` bigeasy
2017-02-16 2:05 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-02-16 2:34 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-02-22 1:43 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-01 15:22 ` bigeasy
2017-03-01 19:03 ` Tracy Smith
2017-03-02 3:23 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-03 19:41 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-03 20:32 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-03 21:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-03 23:36 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-06 11:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-07 2:01 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-07 17:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-20 22:54 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-03 16:51 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-13 20:32 Ran Shalit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1703031733570.4522@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=darren.hart@intel.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ranshalit@gmail.com \
--cc=tlsmith3777@gmail.com \
--cc=vedang.patel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox