From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 5/8] sched: Remove TASK_ALL Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:26:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20171121160654.493640386@goodmis.org> <20171121160706.405135518@goodmis.org> <20171121161907.ovg4ye7czrqlqkx2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171121112732.503a0a32@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Carsten Emde , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , John Kacur , Paul Gortmaker , Julia Cartwright , Daniel Wagner , tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com, Alex Shi , stable-rt@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:35430 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbdKUR1w (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:27:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171121112732.503a0a32@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:19:07 +0100 > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > 4.4.97-rt111-rc1 stable review patch. > > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > No real objection, just curious as to why its -stable material. > > Good question ;-) But it was marked with the stable-rt tag, Thomas > said it was dangerous, and it applied nicely. Yes, it's dangerous and I wanted to make sure that it does not get reused by chance. Thanks, tglx