From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt4 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <4E3089BC.1080001@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Steven Rostedt , Jason Wessel To: Frank Rowand Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E3089BC.1080001@am.sony.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 07/27/11 14:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Dear RT Folks, > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt4 release. > > ARM panda board, PREEMPT_RT_FULL > > -rt3 compiled OK. -rt4 compile fails: > > > mm/init-mm.c:24: error: unknown field 'lock' specified in initializer > mm/init-mm.c:24: error: unknown field 'wait_lock' specified in initializer > mm/init-mm.c:24: error: incompatible types in initialization > mm/init-mm.c:24: error: unknown field 'save_state' specified in initializer > mm/init-mm.c:24: warning: excess elements in struct initializer > mm/init-mm.c:24: warning: (near initialization for 'init_mm.context.id_lock.raw_lock') Bah, that's what I get for trying to vanish. Fix below. --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ typedef struct { /* init_mm.context.id_lock should be initialized. */ #define INIT_MM_CONTEXT(name) \ - .context.id_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.context.id_lock), + .context.id_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.context.id_lock), #else #define ASID(mm) (0) #endif