From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH -rt 5/5] cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:24:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1318762607-2261-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1318762607-2261-6-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <20111024024416.GB24581@zhy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Yong Zhang Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:56479 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753961Ab1JXJY4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:24:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111024024416.GB24581@zhy> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > > > > > Fix below false positive (seems this is not a real deadlock scenario) > > > lockdep warning: > > > > This looks like you caused it with patch 1. > > Hmmm, yup. > CPU_DOWN_PREPARE will be under cpu_hotplug.lock. > > > Both need a bit more > > thought, but thanks for catching that. > > No sure whether it's big issue or not. > Mind showing more about your concern? This is probably not the only place which will run into that issue and I have not much interest to patch all those sites. Thanks, tglx