From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: RT Throtteling with PREEMT-RT on UBIFS root fs update Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:15:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <201111111056.53803.tim.sander@hbm.com> <201111171454.18742.tim.sander@hbm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-rt-users , LKML To: Tim Sander Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:36728 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757261Ab1KQOPS (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:15:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201111171454.18742.tim.sander@hbm.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Tim Sander wrote: > Well it can be said that it is not ksoftirqd/0 going berserk which is > triggering this. So i guess when this message is printed it just shows that > the cpu had been temporarily overloded with work in interrupt context. > Is there more harm to expect from this message or save to ignore if the > systemload is normal again? There is no harm, this message is informative and if that behaviour is directly related to an ubifs update then I'd say we should not worry too much about it. Though it'd be interesting to poke the UBIFS folks about it. Thanks, tglx