From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.12-rt30-rc2 Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:46:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20111204185444.411298317@goodmis.org> <201112042113.37047.tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Carsten Emde , John Kacur To: Tim Sander Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:52853 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755335Ab1LDUqe (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:46:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201112042113.37047.tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Tim Sander wrote: > Hi Steven > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.12-rt30-rc2. > > > > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. > Ok, this is a nearly blind shot, but i was expieriencing strange idle time > behaviour with this Ingo Molnar patch. The idle time was never incremented as > read from /proc/stat for several minutes. The system itself was behaving fine > and had definetly not 100% load which was also verified with top. Did some other time accounting increase instead ?