From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 7/9][RFC] [PATCH 7/9] cpu/rt: Rework cpu down for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:20:04 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203021618330.2742@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330701323.25686.260.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 15:52 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > So no, I rather keep the current problem than applying that insanity.
>
> Note, patches 1,2,3,5 and 6, were bugs I found while debugging hotplug.
> Please add them, they are not insanity fixes but real bug fixes.
Already queued. I'd say #4 is a bug fix as well, though I
fundamentally hate the ass backwards semantics of that new function.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-02 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 18:55 [PATCH RT 0/9][RFC] rt: Fix hotplugging and other nasties Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 1/9][RFC] [PATCH 1/9] timer: Fix hotplug for -rt Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 2/9][RFC] [PATCH 2/9] futex/rt: Fix possible lockup when taking pi_lock in proxy handler Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 3/9][RFC] [PATCH 3/9] lglock/rt: Use non-rt for_each_cpu() in -rt code Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 7:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-02 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 4/9][RFC] [PATCH 4/9] rtmutex: Add new mutex_lock_savestate() API Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 5/9][RFC] [PATCH 5/9] ring-buffer/rt: Check for irqs disabled before grabbing reader lock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 6/9][RFC] [PATCH 6/9] sched/rt: Fix wait_task_interactive() to test rt_spin_lock state Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 7/9][RFC] [PATCH 7/9] cpu/rt: Rework cpu down for PREEMPT_RT Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-02 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 15:20 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-03-02 15:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 15:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-02 15:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 8/9][RFC] [PATCH 8/9] workqueue: Revert workqueue: Fix PF_THREAD_BOUND abuse Steven Rostedt
2012-03-01 18:55 ` [PATCH RT 9/9][RFC] [PATCH 9/9] workqueue: Revert workqueue: Fix cpuhotplug trainwreck Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1203021618330.2742@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox