From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.9-rt21
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:35:49 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212171634070.3148@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355543529.20987.6.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:05 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.9-rt21 release. 3.6.7-rt18, 3.6.8-rt19
> > and 3.6.9-rt20 are not announced updates to the respective 3.6.y
> > stable releases without any RT changes
> >
> > Changes since 3.6.9-rt20:
> >
> > * Fix the PREEMPT_LAZY implementation on ARM
> >
> > * Fix the RCUTINY issues
> >
> > * Fix a long standing scheduler bug (See commit log of
> > sched-enqueue-to-head.patch)
>
> That last has an oversight buglet.
>
> sched: add missing userspace->kernel struct sched_param.sched_priority inversion
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4624,7 +4624,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct t
> p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
>
> oldprio = p->prio;
> - if (oldprio == param->sched_priority)
> + if (oldprio == (MAX_RT_PRIO - 1) - param->sched_priority)
> goto out;
>
> on_rq = p->on_rq;
Duh, yes. But there is another one here:
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, oldprio < param->sched_priority ?
+ ENQUEUE_HEAD : 0);
Bah. This reverse user/kernel priority nonsense really should go away!
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-17 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-05 16:05 [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.9-rt21 Thomas Gleixner
2012-12-06 14:35 ` Tim Sander
2012-12-06 20:52 ` Tim Sander
2012-12-09 0:48 ` Ove Karlsen
[not found] ` <50C3DB17.2010705@earthlink.net>
2012-12-09 10:08 ` Ove Karlsen
2012-12-15 3:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-12-17 15:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-12-17 17:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-12-17 19:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1212171634070.3148@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).