From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: 3.4.28-rt40 arm freescale imx35 pcm43 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:59:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <6003615.pRQnIgKCSn@dabox> <5977343.5KpmQXLB4x@dabox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: Tim Sander Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:58362 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754658Ab3BML7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:59:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5977343.5KpmQXLB4x@dabox> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Tim Sander wrote: > I just noticed that the thread irq/45-IMX-uart is the current thread. > Nevertheless the interrupt for this thread is enabled which seems wrong to me? That's wrong indeed. The forced threading masks the interrupt line in the hard interrupt handling code and keeps it masked. It's unmasked after the handler thread returns from the interrupt handler function. > So the interrupt handler imx_rxint does not get call as it is always > interrupted by the level triggered interrupt of the same hw source? Right. You have to find the reason, why the interrupt is not disabled at the interrupt controller level. Thanks, tglx