Re: [PATCH 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd

[John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>]

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Luiz Capitulino wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500
> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes.
> > I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good
> > for inclusion.
> 
> ping?
> 
> > 
> > Original intro:
> > 
> > In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under
> > trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency
> > specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4.
> > 
> > This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this
> > is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't
> > ditch all tracing support from cyclictest...
> > 
> > Luiz Capitulino (4):
> >   cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace
> >   cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function
> >   cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function
> >   cyclictest: add --tracemark option
> > 
> >  src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> --

I'll have a closer look tomorrow, but these look okay.

John