* hwlatdetect: Add --hardlimit to define the real test failing criteria
@ 2016-08-15 20:28 Clark Williams
2016-08-17 18:00 ` John Kacur
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Clark Williams @ 2016-08-15 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Kacur, RT
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2126 bytes --]
John,
Luis and I were working on our tests and decided it is more interesting, in our
automated tests, to have a higher tolerance for SMIs, as most of the test boxes are
not optimized for RT. On the other hand, we would like to know how big the firmware-induced
latencies on these boxes.
This commit adds the --hardlimit parameter, which defines the real
PASS/FAIL latency criteria. Latencies above --threshold will be
annotated, but the test may PASS if the observed latencies are smaller
than --hardlimit.
When --hardlimit is not informed, the value used for --threshold is also
used as the hard limit.
Signed-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
diff --git a/hwlatdetect.py b/hwlatdetect.py
index d9ef027..51bb401 100755
--- a/hwlatdetect.py
+++ b/hwlatdetect.py
@@ -474,6 +474,10 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
dest="threshold",
help="value above which is considered an hardware latency")
+ parser.add_option("--hardlimit", default=None, type="string",
+ dest="hardlimit",
+ help="value above which the test is considered to fail")
+
parser.add_option("--window", default=None, type="string",
dest="window",
help="time between samples")
@@ -526,6 +530,12 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
detect.set("threshold", t)
debug("threshold set to %dus" % t)
+ if o.hardlimit:
+ hardlimit = microseconds(o.hardlimit)
+ else:
+ hardlimit = detect.get("threshold")
+ debug("hardlimit set to %dus" % hardlimit)
+
if o.window:
w = microseconds(o.window)
if w < detect.get("width"):
@@ -595,5 +605,6 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
for s in detect.samples:
print("%s" % s)
+ maxlatency = int(detect.get("max"))
detect.cleanup()
- sys.exit(exceeding)
+ sys.exit(maxlatency > hardlimit)
--
The United States Coast Guard:
Ruining natural selection since 1790
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: hwlatdetect: Add --hardlimit to define the real test failing criteria
2016-08-15 20:28 hwlatdetect: Add --hardlimit to define the real test failing criteria Clark Williams
@ 2016-08-17 18:00 ` John Kacur
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Kacur @ 2016-08-17 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clark Williams, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves; +Cc: RT
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Clark Williams wrote:
> John,
>
> Luis and I were working on our tests and decided it is more interesting, in our
> automated tests, to have a higher tolerance for SMIs, as most of the test boxes are
> not optimized for RT. On the other hand, we would like to know how big the firmware-induced
> latencies on these boxes.
>
> This commit adds the --hardlimit parameter, which defines the real
> PASS/FAIL latency criteria. Latencies above --threshold will be
> annotated, but the test may PASS if the observed latencies are smaller
> than --hardlimit.
>
> When --hardlimit is not informed, the value used for --threshold is also
> used as the hard limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Note, to apply your patch you have to cd to src/hwlatdetect instead
of being in rt-tests
Since this would go in unstable, we don't have to maintain backwards
compatibility. So, you could remove the --threshold parameter and create
--hardlimit, and --softlimit parameters that consistently do the same
thing. (instead of having --threshold mean two different things depending
on whether or not --hardlimit exists)
That might even be better because you could annotate a --softlimit without
even requiring there to be a hard one.
I'm going to impose a new requirement on people submitting patches to also
submit patches to update documentation. So once, we are agreed on what
this change should look like you have to also change the hwlatdetect.8
page as well as the output to hwlatdetect --help
Thanks
John
>
> diff --git a/hwlatdetect.py b/hwlatdetect.py
> index d9ef027..51bb401 100755
> --- a/hwlatdetect.py
> +++ b/hwlatdetect.py
> @@ -474,6 +474,10 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> dest="threshold",
> help="value above which is considered an hardware latency")
>
> + parser.add_option("--hardlimit", default=None, type="string",
> + dest="hardlimit",
> + help="value above which the test is considered to fail")
> +
> parser.add_option("--window", default=None, type="string",
> dest="window",
> help="time between samples")
> @@ -526,6 +530,12 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> detect.set("threshold", t)
> debug("threshold set to %dus" % t)
>
> + if o.hardlimit:
> + hardlimit = microseconds(o.hardlimit)
> + else:
> + hardlimit = detect.get("threshold")
> + debug("hardlimit set to %dus" % hardlimit)
> +
> if o.window:
> w = microseconds(o.window)
> if w < detect.get("width"):
> @@ -595,5 +605,6 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> for s in detect.samples:
> print("%s" % s)
>
> + maxlatency = int(detect.get("max"))
> detect.cleanup()
> - sys.exit(exceeding)
> + sys.exit(maxlatency > hardlimit)
>
> --
> The United States Coast Guard:
> Ruining natural selection since 1790
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-17 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-15 20:28 hwlatdetect: Add --hardlimit to define the real test failing criteria Clark Williams
2016-08-17 18:00 ` John Kacur
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).