From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leon Woestenberg" Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] [resend as inlined patch] {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:07:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <486E271E.705@sidebranch.com> <1215193280.9513.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Linux Kernel list" , "Peter Zijlstra" , RT , "Steven Rostedt" , "Thomas Gleixner" , leon@sidebranch.com To: "Daniel Walker" Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.251]:45648 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755724AbYGEOHx (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 10:07:53 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so305725and.103 for ; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:07:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1215193280.9513.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Daniel, On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > Looks like you patch has line wrapped damage, and white space damage.. > Thanks, I was unaware of the flowed text issue. Thought to had configured Thunderbird correctly to not flow outgoing plaintext. I have resend the patch using msmtp. In the process, clearified the patch description, the patch itself is identical. Regards, -- Leon