From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andrew Victor" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Atmel Serial Console interrupt handler splitup Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:57:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3efb10970712070724i6fa66666t2b8422329759ce24@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Andrew Victor" , RT , "ARM Linux Mailing List" , "Steven Rostedt" , "David Brownell" , hskinnemoen@atmel.com To: "Remy Bohmer" Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.188]:12369 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890AbXLGT5G (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:57:06 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so800740rvb for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:57:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3efb10970712070724i6fa66666t2b8422329759ce24@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: hi Remy, > What is wise here? should I create a new patchset for mainline? Or can > you push the DMA patch also to mainline together with this set? I have > it working here for months, so I see no reason not to, maybe you have > a reason? The serial driver is also used for Atmel's AVR32 architecture. There was some bug in the DMA patch that causes it to fail there - Haavard was going to look into in when he had time. Once that is resolved, the DMA patch will be submitted to mainline. Regards, Andrew Victor