public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>,
	Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>,
	 linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, williams@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rt-tests: cyclictest: Support idle state disabling via libcpupower
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:29:06 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f297686e-69f8-e2cf-5ccd-0f37cb3192ac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206115201.RJsDmOXi@linutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]



On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

> On 2024-11-27 10:45:49 [+0100], Tomas Glozar wrote:
> > st 27. 11. 2024 v 1:09 odesílatel Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com> napsal:
> > >
> > > This could be said about the laptop and power_management checks too...
> > > I'd go with verbose info prints rather than warnings for all three, if
> > > anything.
> > >
> > 
> > I agree. I believe my code is consistent with what we already have.
> > When you do cyclictest --default-system, you also get a warning about
> > not setting cpu_dma_latency, despite it being what you have explicitly
> > requested. My patch just does the same thing for --deepest-idle-state.
> 
> What is the default behaviour and what is the intended behaviour?
> Couldn't we somehow avoid adding yet another option?

The default doesn't change, you don't have to use the new option.
We want to be able to measure whether using some level of power saving 
will still give us acceptible soft realtime behaviour.

John

> 
> > I suggest deferring this to a future patch that would remove the
> > warnings and another one to refactor the code.
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-13 11:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] rt-tests: cyclictest: Support idle state disabling via libcpupower tglozar
2024-11-13 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rt-tests: Detect libcpupower presence tglozar
2024-11-13 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rt-tests: cyclictest: Support idle state disabling via libcpupower tglozar
2024-11-26 22:29   ` John Kacur
2024-11-27  0:08     ` Crystal Wood
2024-11-27  9:45       ` Tomas Glozar
2024-11-27 15:51         ` John Kacur
2024-12-06 11:52         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-06 12:14           ` Tomas Glozar
2024-12-06 14:41             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-06 15:29           ` John Kacur [this message]
2024-11-27 15:47       ` John Kacur
2024-12-02 19:30         ` Crystal Wood
2024-11-13 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rt-tests: cyclictest: Add --deepest-idle-state to manpage tglozar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f297686e-69f8-e2cf-5ccd-0f37cb3192ac@redhat.com \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=crwood@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox