From: Cliff Brake <cliff.brake@gmail.com>
To: Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rt application question with rs232 communication
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:05:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f96d234e0903161305q40b78e40neeeb0f1a4d4e9271@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c384c5ea0903141907o79ccd790h7b48605feaeba107@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Leon Woestenberg
<leon.woestenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Cliff,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Cliff Brake <cliff.brake@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Clarification, I don't have the RT patch applied, just CONFIG_PREEMPT
>> from Linus's kernel. Reviewing my notes from several years ago, I ran
>> into a similar issue and the RT patch fixed it, so now to figure out
>> the best way to get a recent RT patched ARM kernel ...
>>
>>> timing. However, it seems that the system has trouble receiving the
>>> response in a timely fashion. I often observe that it takes at least
>>> 10ms for the application to receive the response data after the data
>>> has appeared on the rs232 bus. Is the RT patch something that would
>
> We are running a real-time RS-485 protocol where the time window is 1
> ms and only under heavy load we got deadline misses > 1 ms.
> Unfortunately I didn't measure the max latency then, but 10 ms sounds
> like excessive latency to me.
>
> Under 2.6.24.7-rt24 (or whatever -rtxy in that series) we have never
> missed the 1 ms deadline.
Thanks Leon. I guess its pretty obvious at this point I need the RT
patch. Still trying to figure out the best way to get this with
2.6.27 or later -- I really don't want to go back to 2.6.26.
Thanks,
Cliff
--
=======================
Cliff Brake
http://bec-systems.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 21:34 rt application question with rs232 communication Cliff Brake
2009-03-10 12:44 ` Cliff Brake
2009-03-15 2:07 ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-03-16 20:05 ` Cliff Brake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f96d234e0903161305q40b78e40neeeb0f1a4d4e9271@mail.gmail.com \
--to=cliff.brake@gmail.com \
--cc=leon.woestenberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox