From: "Devang Tailor" <dev.tailor@samsung.com>
To: <robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
<faraz.ata@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] On-chip RTC support for ExynosAutov9
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:09:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001dc1cc7$6bfee9d0$43fcbd70$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710083434.1821671-1-dev.tailor@samsung.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devang Tailor <dev.tailor@samsung.com>
> Sent: 10 July 2025 14:05
> To: robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> rtc@vger.kernel.org; faraz.ata@samsung.com
> Cc: Devang Tailor <dev.tailor@samsung.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] On-chip RTC support for ExynosAutov9
>
> Enable on-chip RTC support. The on-chip RTC of this SoC is similar to the
> previous versions of Samsung SoC. So re-use the existing RTC driver with
> applicable call-backs for initialization and IRQ handling.
> Add a separate call-back for disabling RTC since existing '.disable'
> call-backs updates additional bit not valid for RTC of ExynosAutov9.
>
> Setting and getting hardware clock has been tested using 'hwclock'
> and 'date' utilities.
>
> Alarm interrupt has been checked with incrementing interrupt count via "cat
> /proc/interrupts | grep rtc" for 10sec wakeup time via "echo +10 >
> /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm"
>
> changelog
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed the review comment of v1 for mis-aligmnent & asymmetry bit logic.
> - link for v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20250702052426.2404256-1-
> dev.tailor@samsung.com/
>
Reminder!
Can you please help to identify if anything is pending in this patch series ? I see all three patches are reviewed.
>
> Devang Tailor (3):
> dt-bindings: rtc: s3c-rtc: add compatible for exynosautov9
> rtc: s3c: support for exynosautov9 on-chip RTC
> arm64: dts: exynosautov9: add RTC DT node
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/s3c-rtc.yaml | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9-sadk.dts | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
>
> base-commit: 58ba80c4740212c29a1cf9b48f588e60a7612209
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250710082533epcas5p111be26bea2ccc08718eebcb12929bbbf@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-07-10 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] On-chip RTC support for ExynosAutov9 Devang Tailor
[not found] ` <CGME20250710082534epcas5p40b49f5662ff36306349e6721fa9811fe@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2025-07-10 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: s3c-rtc: add compatible for exynosautov9 Devang Tailor
2025-07-11 7:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-30 4:15 ` Alim Akhtar
[not found] ` <CGME20250710082536epcas5p4f9dcd50ff474066562b2cbd40199d2d9@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2025-07-10 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rtc: s3c: support for exynosautov9 on-chip RTC Devang Tailor
2025-07-11 7:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-11 9:52 ` Devang Tailor
2025-07-30 4:17 ` Alim Akhtar
2025-09-03 19:20 ` Henrik Grimler
2025-09-04 9:13 ` Devang Tailor
[not found] ` <CGME20250710082538epcas5p2556f80b4193a046262808ae7742675be@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-07-10 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynosautov9: add RTC DT node Devang Tailor
2025-07-30 4:26 ` Alim Akhtar
2025-09-03 11:39 ` Devang Tailor [this message]
2025-09-03 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] On-chip RTC support for ExynosAutov9 Alexandre Belloni
2025-09-03 13:51 ` Devang Tailor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001dc1cc7$6bfee9d0$43fcbd70$@samsung.com' \
--to=dev.tailor@samsung.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=faraz.ata@samsung.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).